GGIFA

Management, fleet, accommodation, meals and life in flying academies.

Re: GGIFA

Postby Radioactive » Mon Jun 08, 2009 6:47 pm

What is important here is the school must have enough aircraft in operation. What type, tak kisah lah.
Radioactive
 
 
Posts: 47
Joined: Tue Jun 02, 2009 3:09 pm

Re: GGIFA

Postby Mr_Aviator » Mon Jun 08, 2009 6:53 pm

Radioactive wrote:What is important here is the school must have enough aircraft in operation. What type, tak kisah lah.


yup
that is absolutely correct
Mr_Aviator
 
 
Posts: 363
Joined: Mon Jun 01, 2009 11:12 pm

Re: GGIFA

Postby golden1111 » Mon Jun 08, 2009 8:20 pm

i agree with u all. any type of aircraft would do as long as our flying hours can be logged. in this case i think ggifa doesnt have any problems dont you think?
The engine is the heart of an aeroplane, but the pilot is its soul
User avatar
golden1111
 
 
Posts: 253
Joined: Mon Jun 01, 2009 11:00 pm
Location: WBGB/BTU

Re: GGIFA

Postby aviation_apek » Mon Jun 08, 2009 10:40 pm

Is Diamond aircraft a highly recommended training aircraft? Cessna 172-yes!

GGIFA's Cessna 172 flight simulator have been up. Should be ready for student use another 2 weeks.
aviation_apek
 
 
Posts: 68
Joined: Wed Jun 03, 2009 11:52 pm

Re: GGIFA

Postby Radioactive » Mon Jun 08, 2009 11:03 pm

I don't know about Diamond aircrafts but I sure know that the 172 is a proven aircraft especially for flight training. :p
Radioactive
 
 
Posts: 47
Joined: Tue Jun 02, 2009 3:09 pm

Re: GGIFA

Postby Mr_Aviator » Mon Jun 08, 2009 11:35 pm

well...If it is not suitable for flight training purpose....APFT and HMA wont buy those aircrafts...
anyway,yeah I agree...most of the flying school not refering to malaysia (outside malaysia) would prefer to use cessna aircraft..
Mr_Aviator
 
 
Posts: 363
Joined: Mon Jun 01, 2009 11:12 pm

Re: GGIFA

Postby golden1111 » Tue Jun 09, 2009 12:04 am

Radioactive wrote:I don't know about Diamond aircrafts but I sure know that the 172 is a proven aircraft especially for flight training. :p


may i know what makes you say so. im not really familiar with 172s
The engine is the heart of an aeroplane, but the pilot is its soul
User avatar
golden1111
 
 
Posts: 253
Joined: Mon Jun 01, 2009 11:00 pm
Location: WBGB/BTU

Re: GGIFA

Postby Radioactive » Tue Jun 09, 2009 12:22 am

The 172 has been around for many years and is proven to be a reliable aircraft. Parts are easily available which is very important coz you do not want to have your aircraft grounded for too long. It's like owning a Mercedes where obtaining spareparts is easy but if you own a Jaguar, you'll have to wait a while for parts. The Cessna company is also very established and you can be assured that they will be around for many more years.

-- Tue Jun 09, 2009 12:28 am --

For more info on the 172s :p , checkout http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cessna_172.
Radioactive
 
 
Posts: 47
Joined: Tue Jun 02, 2009 3:09 pm

Re: GGIFA

Postby love biscuits » Tue Jun 09, 2009 2:04 am

Diamonds spare parts too expensive laa than Cessna?
love biscuits
 
 
Posts: 168
Joined: Tue Jun 02, 2009 4:43 pm
Location: KUL

Re: GGIFA

Postby golden1111 » Tue Jun 09, 2009 2:11 am

thx radioactive. so youre saying the diamond is used less than the cessna?
The engine is the heart of an aeroplane, but the pilot is its soul
User avatar
golden1111
 
 
Posts: 253
Joined: Mon Jun 01, 2009 11:00 pm
Location: WBGB/BTU

PreviousNext

Return to Flying Academies

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest